MAC The house of war why the anti-property law, bu

The house of war: why the anti-property law, but the demolition of the Ordinance: the fate of the wind

The house of war: why the resistance, but demolition of the Property Law Bill
??????????????????Of: the fate of the wind
????????????????? Original starting 2009-11-25?? Popularity: 2113

near, heard the news about the demolitions, not strong demolition is resisted demolitions. Just-entered the room holding a strong burst of demolition to play, beating the old cause of hospitalization; a hand to his own house demolitions confrontation with Molotov cocktails; there are gang fights like a rogue general head of unauthorized entry to homes and home, was stabbed to death head of the household. Shocking events of this system shows the demolition side and the head of household has the potential of fire, explosive, if the manager is likely to lead to groups of poor event. Closer look at such events will find that demolitions are demolitions of both sides, and each have their own view, each have their basis, one is based on \Urban House Demolition Management Regulations \

remember the Phoenix \The old lady holding a [link widoczny dla zalogowanych]hete war vowed that: \In the eyes of this old lady was a very brutal war, a war for this relocation, the people even over their own life. Zhang Jian also because they can not bear the ultimate resistance in victimizes demolitions,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], and that Zhang Jian comfort is the ultimate defense contractors, but who can guarantee that such incidents will not play it? Carter, Minhang District, Shanghai to conduct forced evictions, landlords to offset gasoline bottles, Molotov cocktails and a woman in a government demolition forklifts formal speech battle. Owner shouted \, the lawful private property protected by law, property law also stipulates that at the same time,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], family, collective and private property are legally protected, the property of the three are equally important, equally protected by law. The hands of the owners have land use right certificates and building ownership certificates, warrants in hand the case to be protected by law,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], are the rights of property law regulations than bigger?

demolitions might say the real estate side, we are under the \interest and in accordance with the law of the authority and procedures for collective ownership of land and collection units,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], one of the houses and other property. \interests, public interest criteria should be how to define, and collected after the house was built in the building,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], or villas in place whether it is in the public interests, whether these are the people to have a reasonable explanation; the second is when the house was after the expropriation,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], it would have a collection of compensation,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], rather than relocation compensation, reviewed after the public interest because it is imposed rather than demolition, the collection is a way of change of ownership, the house was imposed on the part of the Government's ownership, but only give reasonable compensation to the owners . Unfortunately, the occurrence of either a lot of demolitions is not to relocation compensation; or else very little to compensation. Do not want to know, the house will be the next homeless after demolitions, who will watch their displaced it?

been forcibly evicted owners Rong Pan made a very vivid metaphor: \I only very beautiful, and then you see whether he will lay eggs, what will happen, forced upon me, and I do not, you still put the sheep led away, that does not work. \not to allow property owners to compensation can not guarantee to have a living, or is forced demolitions do not give compensation altogether,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], so it made so much tragedy. House is their private property, are protected by law, but the conflict and Demolition Ordinance, the so-called \

I am doing a good job on the economic development and livelihood of the people against each other with more do not agree to the growth of GDP at the expense of people's livelihood practices. Because our government is a service-oriented government, the ultimate goal of economic development is also to have been a good son, but also to ensure that all the people \the home, \However, some local governments have the power collusion more than once to help people get to the real estate owner, and then a clear conscience, had built high-rise buildings and villas in place, and then re-sold at high prices, power boosting the local GDP growth. The zero of this, net income for local governments for economic development is of course good, but the harm done to the general public, the so-called \How many people will lead to the displacement of homeless. Therefore, repeal or modify \

相关的主题文章：

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

The post has been approved 0 times