Physical Reality and Our Knowledge

,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
v class="googleright">We have determined that knowledge of the physical world is equitable the tested propositions achieved by the smart use of the data of reconnaissance. These propositions are referred to the physical world as their object of judgment. We come to the determination that physical asset have size, eliminate one variant, are massive,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], have framework and union, have capacities for action, and conduct in definite describable ways.
In the maximum natural shape, we make claims to a legal knowledge of this arrange, and, so far as we can discern, skepticism has not rational foundation opposition it. The foundation of modern ideal??istic skepticism is the denial to distinguish among the datum of perception and the object of perception, or between a sample application and a inhabitant petition.
We think physical reality in terms of our perception of it. It is this analytic physical reality in terms of our wisdom which the reference of our knowledge apt reality means. We are confined apt knowledge since we cannot intuit physical reality; but we have given cement reasons for our belief in the correspondence of datum and thing.
The tests of conformity are internal or experiential, and are the tests applied to particular decrees from the perceptual to the conceptual level. But we have given the whole resultant construction its final foundation by pointing out the responsible conformity of emotional data to the physical existents which are the objects of perception. These latter we have been adapted to shriek the controls. When this location is once apparently understood,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych],[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], it will be achieved namely the validity of knowledge of the physical world is its conformity to reality.
In the light of this interpretation we tin survey the structure of our fussy knowledge about physical things. An clear act of knowledge seems to contain at least three factors: (1) the affirmed existent with its determinate nature and continuities; (2) the propositional content among con??sciousness; and (3) the act of reference of the second to the first as informative of it.
This inquiry separates what is given together in a intricate act of judgment,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], and but it does not falsify the truths of the circumstance. It appears that these elements are diacritical in any judgment cared with physical entities. The physical existent is the subject of the judgment, and its name or character is the subject of the proposal; the predicate is the message approximately it; and the copula indicates the reference or relevance of the 2.
We think the existent declared in terms of the "objectives" a

The post has been approved 0 times