Nike Air Max 95 The Compromise of 1850 Senate Reso

The 31st Congress was called to order December 3, 1849. After weeks of sorting through petitions,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], Henry Clay of Kentucky presented eight resolutions designed to “settle and adjust amicably all existing questions of controversy…arising out of the institution of slavery.” The Senate began debating his resolution the following Tuesday, February 5,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], 1850. By the adjournment of the Senate that summer, the “Compromise of 1850” was law, sectional tension was higher, and one of the great Senate thinkers, John C Calhoun, had died.
The Resolutions of Henry Clay Known as the Compromise of 1850
Read on
Wilmot Proviso Provoked Southern Outrage
The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 and Northern Response
The Life of Millard Fillmore
Although Senator Clay envisioned a compromise designed to give the North and the South some measure of satisfaction, it stirred up a hornet’s nest of often angry debate. Many senators proposed amendments favorable to their constituencies. Senator Pratt of Maryland argued for federal compensation to slaveholders that lost income resulting from fugitive slaves. Jefferson Davis of Mississippi favored extending the 1820 Missouri Compromise line to the Pacific.
Although President Zachary Taylor urged the speedy admittance of California into the Union, he opposed the expansion of slavery into the other territories. According to Historian Frederick Merk, “Taylor would have met any southern move toward secession at the head of the United States army.” Taylor,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], however, died in July and the new President, Millard Fillmore, supported the resolutions.
Northerners also opposed parts of the Compromise,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], most notably the new Fugitive Slave Act. Both New York and Wisconsin attempted to nullify this act, without success. The issue of extending slavery beyond those states in which the institution already existed would dominate political and sectional thought
California would be admitted as a free-soil state based on its state constitutionCongress should not introduce or “exclude” slavery in any of the new territoriesThe western boundary of Texas should conform to the Rio del NorteThe U.S. government will pay Texas' pre-annexation monetary claimsTexas will “relinquish…any claim which it has to any part of New MexicoSlavery will continue to exist as an institution in the District of Columbia as long as it exists in MarylandThe sale or slave trade within the District will be abolishedA stronger “fugitive slave” provision be enactedCongress has “no power to prohibit or obstruct the trade in slaves between slave holding States…
Debating the Compromise of 1850
Passage of the separate bills was due in large measure to the efforts of Stephen Douglas, who maneuvered the legislation through Congress after Clay returned to Kentucky. Southerners, for the most part, viewed the Compromise with disdain and in four southern states, conventions met to consider secession.
Results of the Compromise of 1850
John C. Calhoun, whose speech was read by Virginia’s Senator Mason, called for a constitutional amendment establishing two sectional Presidents. Calhoun, already frail, died in March. William Henry Seward’s speech referred to a “higher law” that superseded the Constitution in terms of slavery. Both Seward and Salmon Chase of Ohio urged the adoption of the Wilmot Proviso. Stephen Douglas of Illinois supported the resolutions in an attempt to assuage sectional discord. Although representing a Northern state, Douglas owned slaves himself through his second marriage.
相关的主题文章：

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

Nike Shox Onine The Axis Powers and Strategic Bomb

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

The post has been approved 0 times