|
| Author |
Message |
ghdhair100
Forum Master
Joined: 15 Dec 2010
Posts: 1972
Read: 0 topics
Location: England
|
|
 梁志天设计 |
|
07.JPG­,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
60.JPG­
­
78.JPG­
48.JPG­
­
具有代表性有这几点：清玻隔断 茶色玻璃 天花上置银镜 餐厅包框银镜......等­
59.JPG­
63.JPG­
14.JPG­
七、装饰品及挂画­
76.JPG­
006.JPG­
­
­
106.JPG­
­
17.JPG­
­
­
­
二：层板装饰架­
­
四、楼梯­
109.JPG­
001.JPG­
107.JPG­
方元 方元­
24.JPG­
89.JPG­
删繁就简 领异标新的衣柜风格 暗藏扣手 素色面板­
­
19.JPG­
­
77.JPG­
­
35.JPG­
­
­
空白的墙要么用挂画来点缀 要么就是用大面积的进口壁纸 要么就是灯­
39.JPG­
23.JPG­
88.JPG­
层板背后藏T5暖色灯管似乎已经成了梁志天的标志性作品­
004.JPG­
30.JPG­
­
­
34.JPG­
灯对环境气氛的作用息息相关 梁志天对光的控制亦是出色得体 灯的造型也是个重要因素­
103.JPG­
42.JPG­
01.JPG­
这些空间里的精灵不只带来生气亦带来情趣 其中不乏梁志天设计的装饰品­
­
­
37.JPG­
­
­
­
81.JPG­
15.JPG­
­
­
­
­
­
­
­
20.JPG­
69.JPG­
­
12.JPG­
­
他的简约风格在设计界 独树一帜的设计元素使人几乎可以一眼看出他的作品­
44.JPG­
57.JPG­
­
53.JPG­
­
45.JPG­
­
­
­
47.JPG­
104.JPG­
­
002.JPG­
18.JPG­
­
04.JPG­
­
­
­
72.JPG­
85.JPG­
­
­
21.JPG­
86.JPG­
­
­
55.JPG­
­
40.JPG­
­
10.JPG­
­
­
­
62.JPG­
六、衣柜­
02.JPG­
68.JPG­
58.JPG­
­
­
32.JPG­
三、灯具­
­
94.JPG­
­
26.JPG­
16.JPG­
33.JPG­
­
趁空闲 现来和大家一起讨论其中的几个元素 一起学习,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]。­
64.JPG­
­
­
­
80.JPG­
­
­
­
36.JPG­
­
05.JPG­
­
22.JPG­
­
115.JPG­
­
105.JPG­
­
41.JPG­
­
一挚­
67.JPG­
73.JPG­
­
继续­
50.JPG­
­
11.JPG­
102.JPG­
­
110.JPG­
­
­
114.JPG­
90.JPG­
65.JPG­
­
­
005.JPG­
84.JPG­
玻璃的运用得当 可使空间更具结构感 通透性 梁志天在这方面发挥的淋漓尽致­
­
­
­
不同远来的只是摆放问题 在现在的设计元素里 家具的造型 舒适度 搭配都非常重要 梁志天和美兆的合作 推出的“一挚”和“方元”系列 充分显示出了他的才华­
­
­
111.JPG­
003.JPG­
­
54.JPG­
61.JPG­
112.JPG­
­
06.JPG­
83.JPG­
007.JPG­
­
­
92.JPG­
­
­
如此著名的设计师 想必也不用过多的介绍了的­
52.JPG­
­
­
43.JPG­
­
­
108.JPG­
­
­
­
51.JPG­
82.JPG­
71.JPG­
91.JPG­
56.JPG­
一：玻璃­
­
­
27.JPG­
13.JPG­
66.JPG­
八、家具­
­
­
­
28.JPG­
­
­
93.JPG­
03.JPG­
46.JPG­
101.JPG­
­
­
­
­
31.JPG­
87.JPG­
­
­
­
09.JPG­
五、墙纸­
74.JPG­
­
­
梁志天­
08.JPG­
25.JPG­
­
75.JPG­
113.JPG­
38.JPG­
79.JPG­
­
29.JPG­
­
­
­
­
­
­
­
70.JPG­
The Court of Appeal pointed out that R and F's submission in the county court was of overt, conscious racism, and it was not prepared to find that there had been unconscious discrimination.The decisionThe Court of Appeal said that, unlike the ordinary civil claim where the judge decides, on the claimant's evidence only, whether the claimant has made out a case, in this case the judge had had the benefit of the whole of the evidence. Despite the school's failure to comply with the statutory requirements, the judge had been entitled to find on the basis of all the evidence that R and F had not proved racial discrimination.
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
The post has been approved 0 times
|
|
| Mon 3:58, 14 Mar 2011 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
