fred perry outlet Why the low rate of academic ref

_2539
Why the low rate of academic references?

No references. The fourth problem is the lack of research in writing an important part of the process of complete information, most people do not combine to explain his discussion of the results obtained. Science, technology, engineering, agriculture and medicine is an important part of the paper analytical results, and often some of our conclusions instead of the discussion paper, no discussion of what people do not know the importance and innovation. The fifth problem is that there is no first-hand original research papers the results of their analysis of a pass, come to the result of someone else. The sixth question is not already described the results of similar work, not to mention people of to what extent, and only said that he is the world's advanced level, this is contrary to scientific ethics. Solve these problems, from many aspects. I think if we can learn from other people's papers cited a positive way, we can solve our problems in the six several issues. If he can seriously cited papers, the first three issues to resolve, and the fourth part of the problem can be solved, because of the discussion will understand what is, what is the result, what is a conclusion. On the good do not have papers, will guide the formation of low-level low-level thesis papers situation. From a modern science and technology has been named to the Chinese laws, methods, results very little. For example, we have the Einstein equation, but few have heard Joe Smith equation, Sally equation. We regret that we have a responsibility to themselves, there are subjective factors, but also objective factors. Anyway, we have no reference to the work done, so we lost a lot of voice. Why do Chinese people refer to their low rate of paper? Our low rate of academic references, like rotten food in the warehouse, not a 62 one was found. Improve academic quality, increase citation rate from the beginning. We hope that the citation rate to a higher level, not only to refer to foreign papers, but also cited China's paper, not only to refer to their papers, but also cited peer papers, to refer to a component of paper, to quote the paper is recognized. I think that there are four reasons for low academic references: the first is the impetuous wind. Some people write papers just for the purpose of commentary titles, comments, Professor, Ph.D., is to take the diploma, a degree certificate, as long as there are papers on the line, made an end, with reference not bow f does not matter, no matter who else with the world He did the same work. Some people believe that refers to someone else's point of view, they are not a thing to not be considered innovative? To wear the hat of innovation,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], rather self-deceiving. There were such things, I do not quote, I do not make mistakes,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], but I do not quote me on the commentary on the first prize, and why? Not original! It is the original one-sided understanding. With the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, the Himalayas,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], only,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], only Mount Everest. None of the three levels, there is no Mount Everest. However, many of our paper gives the impression that I do not see the basis of his work, peer work, do not know his The second reason is the influence of traditional culture, self-modesty, while writers who. Humility to their original work is not done a good job reference. Ten years in the work of a scientist, he published at least two thirty, he never wrote the article quoted his former post,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], he thought it was shameful to say that self-citation by others, I do not know since when People think that since the lead is not good. The continuity of science and technology, the development requirements no matter who is right can reference. Writers who make reference to other papers in disdain. The third reason is the history of science led us use less. What is the history of science? Because of modern technology for the Chinese, is a foreign culture, are exotic, so its nothing to reference things. No need to quote, there is no tradition. In Western countries, reference is a tradition, is the industry's ethics, morality is to refer to the first publicly that Mr Tan is doing better than me, this is the Western tradition. The fourth reason should be attributed to immaturity of our science and technology. We in science and technology and stable development of technology only 30 years, 30 years is very valuable for us. However, we have to be realistic to say that people have developed 200 years, 300 years. Immature science and technology has led to our lack of reference, but we can not wait until ripe for the job we have to leapfrog development. Therefore, I advocate for improvements in academic citations, one for experts to write papers and more references to papers, including other people's papers and their papers; the second is an expert in technology management to encourage measures to improve all aspects of citation rate, this two things to do, I believe that China will gradually improve the quality of academic papers.

相关的主题文章：

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

The post has been approved 0 times