坨慴慫敳⁇潯杬攠䅤卥湳攠獹獴敭漠獰散楡氿ഊഊ周攠扡獩挠慲牡湧敭敮琠楮⁷桩捨⁇潯杬攠䅤卥湳攠獹獴敭⁷潲歳猠獵捨⁴桡琠䝯潧汥慳⁴桥慳楣潮瑲潬癥爠瑨攠䅤猠瑨慴牥楳灬慹敤渠瑨攠睥扳楴敳畢獣物扥搠瑯⁇潯杬攠䅤卥湳攠獹獴敭⸠佦潵牳攬⁴桥⁷敢獩瑥睮敲慮畳瑯浩穥潷渠䅤潯歳湤汳漠扬潣欯晩汴敲敲瑡楮⁴祰敳映䅤猠潮⁴桥楲⁷敢獩瑥⸠周攠䅤猠瑨慴⁇潯杬攠獥牶敳牥ₑ卥湳敦畬鈠䅤猠⡴桥獥⁁摳牥捴畡汬礠牥汥癡湴⁴漠瑨攠瑯灩捳⁴桡琠瑨攠睥扳楴攠摩獣畳獥猯慴敲猭瑯⤮⁔桩猠楳潭整桩湧⁴桡琠楳潴潵湤渠潴桥爠慤癥牴楳楮朠灲潧牡浳⽳祳瑥浳⸠周楳牥慴敳⁷楮楮楴畡瑩潮潲癥特潮攮ഊഊ周攠灥潰汥⁷桯牥⁶楳楴楮朠瑨攠睥扳楴攠⡴桡琠捯湴慩湳⁇潯杬攠䅤卥湳攠䅤猩牥潩湧漠扥捡畳攠瑨敹牥湴敲敳瑥搠楮⁴桥⁰牯摵捴⽳敲癩捥⽴潰楣⁴桡琠楳楳捵獳敤渠瑨慴⁷敢獩瑥⸠䥴⁷潵汤攠潦楴瑬攠畳攠瑯⁴桥洠楦⁹潵⁷敲攠瑯敲癥⁁摳⁴桡琠慲攠湯琠牥污瑥搠瑯⁴桥⁴潰楣渠慮礠睡礮⁏渠瑨攠潴桥爠桡湤Ⱐ䅤猠牥污瑥搠瑯⁴桥⁴潰楣映瑨攠睥扳楴攠睯畬搠牥慬汹⁰牯癥⁵獥晵氠瑯⁴桥⁶楳楴潲⸠周敹楧桴捴畡汬礠扥湴敲敳瑥搠楮⁰牯摵捴爠獥牶楣攠瑨慴猠扥楮朠慤癥牴楳敤⁴桲潵杨⁇潯杬攠䅤卥湳攠䅤献⁓漬⁷敢獩瑥⁶楳楴潲猠来琠愠物捨敲硰敲楥湣攠摵攠瑯⁁摓敮獥⁰牯杲慭⸍敢獩瑥睮敲猠来琠牥癥湵攠景爠摩獰污祩湧⁴桥⁇潯杬攠䅤卥湳攠䅤猠慮搠景爠瑨攠捬楣歳⁴桥礠牥捥楶攠潮⁴桥⁁摳⸠卯Ⱐ瑨敹牥慰灹⁴潯⸠䅳慲猠扵獩湥獳敳⽡摶敲瑩獥牳牥潮捥牮敤Ⱐ瑨敹整祳瑥洠⡁摓敮獥祳瑥洩潲⁴慲来瑥搠慤癥牴楳楮朠瑨慴猠扯瑨慳礠慮搠散潮潭楣慬⁴漠潰敲慴攮੍潲敯癥爬⁇潯杬攠䅤卥湳攠䅤猠慲攠灲敳敮瑥搠楮畣栠扥瑴敲⁷慹⁴桡渠瑨攠扡湮敲⁁摳爠潴桥爠瑹灥猠潦⁁摳⸠䵯獴映瑨攠䅤猠慲攠獩浰汥⁴數琠䅤猠瑨慴牥汥慲湤潮捩獥⸠周攠睥扳楴攠潷湥牳楮搠楴慳礠慮搠瑨攠慤癥牴楳敲猠晩湤琠敡獹⁴潯⸠䝯潧汥⁁摓敮獥猠牥慬汹湥映瑨攠扥獴摶敲瑩獩湧⁰牯杲慭猠慶慩污扬攠瑯摡礮,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]The Court of Appeal pointed out that R and F's submission in the county court was of overt, conscious racism, and it was not prepared to find that there had been unconscious discrimination.The decisionThe Court of Appeal said that, unlike the ordinary civil claim where the judge decides, on the claimant's evidence only, whether the claimant has made out a case, in this case the judge had had the benefit of the whole of the evidence. Despite the school's failure to comply with the statutory requirements, the judge had been entitled to find on the basis of all the evidence that R and F had not proved racial discrimination.
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum